logo

Global Warming In the News

SearchRSS Feed

Herald News - 9/22/2006

New Jersey group proposing ways to reduce global warming

 

 

 

If New Jersey were a country, it would be the 32nd highest carbon dioxide polluter in the world, a new report shows.

That might not seem surprising in a state where people say "What exit?" instead of "Where ya from?" But a state environmental group said Thursday New Jersey's leaders and residents could change all that.

Environment New Jersey, an arm of the New Jersey Public Interest Research Group, released a report with 11 suggestions for how the state could reduce carbon dioxide emissions to curb global warming.

The recommendations range from updating state building codes to providing more money for clean-energy programs, but the suggestions focus heavily on cutting transportation-related pollutants, which amount to more than half of carbon dioxide emissions.

Some of the suggestions struck some local commuters and business owners on Thursday as a little far-fetched.

The report suggests, for example, that the state implement pay-as-you-drive car insurance that relies more on mileage to set rates. It also calls for the state to mandate companies promote greater use of carpooling and mass transit.

Such plans would be difficult for Charlie Dino, a Flemington resident who drives for more than an hour every day to work at Caraustar Custom Packaging in Clifton.

"Once I got into Clifton, I'd have to walk here," Dino said. The walk to the office is about three miles.

The report also suggests creating more community shuttle programs to get people around. It also calls for the state to help businesses offset the costs of implementing the programs, including preferential parking for carpoolers and emergency ride programs for employees stuck late at work.

Still, the recommendations aren't easy to implement in a sprawling, densely populated state.

"It just doesn't work in the suburbs," said Fateme Ghahary, executive vice-president at Safas Corp., a Clifton company that manufactures raw materials for surfacing products.

Many of the company's 60 employees have a daily commute of about 20 to 25 minutes, and several travel all the way from Pennsylvania, Ghahary said.

"You go anywhere in Europe or even New York City, and every corner has a subway station," she said. "But if you want to come to Clifton from Ridgewood, you get dropped off at Main Street, which could be five or 10 miles from where you work."

In the early 1990s, the state and federal government required New Jersey employers to start programs aimed at cutting commutes, but after heavy opposition, the policy was no longer mandated in 1996, according to the report. Similar programs in Washington state and Oregon have effectively reduced commuter travel, the report noted.

The report also encouraged further development of transit villages to give people the option of living near public transportation, an idea the group says will foster urban redevelopment as well as healthy air.

"It's focusing development and providing incentives to development, and making sure there are transit hubs in areas where we know we need redevelopment," said Suzanne Leta Liou, spokeswoman for Environment New Jersey.

The report commends the state for introducing some forward-thinking policies on producing electricity, which is also a major source of emissions.

Gov. Jon S. Corzine issued an executive order earlier this year directing the state to get 20 percent of its energy from renewable sources by the year 2020. New Jersey also has joined the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative -- or RGGI, a network of northeastern states that capped utility emissions levels and implemented a trading system for emissions permits.

But there are loopholes in the initiative, the report cautioned. For example, the rules governing the program do not prevent New Jersey utilities from increasing emissions in non-RGGI states and selling it to New Jersey.

Though some of the programs, especially the commuter-focused ones, may be difficult to implement over the short term, the advocacy group thinks that investing in long-term solutions and promoting energy efficiency will only benefit consumer pocketbooks, government and businesses.

Leta Liou said building codes and some of the clean-energy investments take only five to 10 years to pay for themselves.

"There are a few that include investment, like building our infrastructure," Leta Liou said. "Almost all of the suggestions will end up saving consumers and the government money."

Reach Ashley Kindergan at 973-569-7164 or kindergan@northjersey.com.