logo

Clean Water Testimony

SearchRSS Feed

Mercury Emissions from Industrial Facilities


Official comments made by Emily Rusch before the NJDEP.

 

As the new home of NJPIRG's environmental work, Environment New Jersey can be contacted regarding this news release.

NJPIRG strongly supports the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s efforts to limit mercury emissions from industrial facilities.

Mercury, a neurotoxin so potent that a spoonful can contaminate a mid-sized lake, poses significant health risks to New Jersey residents. It has been known since the 1950s that releases of mercury from human activity can accumulate in fish and other wildlife. All of New Jersey’s waterways have warnings not to eat certain fish from those waterways because of mercury contamination. Mercury exposure causes damage to the brain, kidneys, and the cardiovascular system, and has the greatest impact on the most vulnerable—young children and pregnant women. In 2002, the Centers for Disease Control released the findings of a study that showed that eight percent of women of childbearing age tested above the safe level for mercury. This would translate to approximately five million women across the country with elevated levels of mercury, putting an estimated 322,000 newborns at risk. Exposure to methylmercury interferes with the development and function of the central nervous system, and prenatal exposure is linked to health effects like impaired memory ability, and poor performance on tests of attention and language.

NJPIRG participated on the Second New Jersey Mercury Task Force in 1998, where experts convened to study the risks of mercury exposure, and we advocated for solutions to lower the risks of mercury contamination for New Jersey residents, including strict standards on industrial facilities. NJPIRG was highly disappointed that the findings of that Task Force did not lead to significant action at the time to reduce the threat of mercury contamination.

It is imperative that New Jersey reduces these health risks from toxic mercury contamination. The industrial facilities to be regulated under the proposed rules, MSW incinerators, HMIW incinerators, coal-fired boilers, and iron or steel smelters, are among the largest contributors of mercury contamination, and the new rules could reduce mercury emissions by up to 1,500 pounds a year. NJPIRG applauds the McGreevey Administration for this significant step forward to protect the health and safety of New Jersey residents.

NJPIRG recommends that the Department of Environmental Protection adopt these regulations as quickly as possible. NJPIRG does not support the alternative emissions limits, such as those that were proposed by PSE&G at the public hearing on March 4th. The health impacts of mercury pollution are too dangerous to allow companies not to meet the proposed limits. NJPIRG also encourages the Department of Environmental Protection to consider continuous emissions monitoring to ensure that the limits are carefully met.

NJPIRG would also like to note that mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants and other energy sources are one important reason why New Jersey must continue to promote clean, renewable sources of energy like wind and solar power to meet our energy needs. NJPIRG strongly supports a comprehensive, four-pollutant strategy (carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and mercury) to reduce power plant emissions, both within the state of New Jersey and across the country.